|
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Next Page»
|
| Title |
Description |
| NEM Submits NV Comments |
On Assembly Bill 661 |
| NEM Submits Comments in VA |
On Wires Charge Calculation Methodology |
| NEM Submits Comments in Ohio |
In Opposition to DEO and Columbia Gas Proposed Modifications to GCR Rate Calculations |
| NEM Files NY Comments |
NEM Supports Gas Metering on a competitive basis |
| NEM Comments on Proposed Do-Not-Call Registry |
Telemarketer Rulemaking - User Fees |
| NEM Submits FERC Comments |
on Standardized Generation Interconnection. |
| NEM Submits FERC Supplemental Comments |
Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers |
| NEM Files MI Testimony of Philip O'Connor |
Application of Detroit Edison to unbundle its retail rates - MPSC Case No. U-13286 |
| NEM Submits ILLINOIS Comments |
NEM and Members Submit Comments in support of Telephonic and Internet Enrollment |
| NEM Files MI Comments |
Comments on DTE Energy's 2002 Customer Service Improvement Plan, and Staff's Report |
| NEM Submits VA Comments |
On Questions Related to the Facilitation of Effective Retail Competition in the State. |
| NEM Comments on EIA Form 910 |
NEM files comments on proposed extension of EIA Form 910 |
| NEM Files FTC Comments |
On Telemarketing Sales Rules - NOPR. |
| NEM Files NY Comments |
On ConEd's Phase 5 Filing, ConEd's proposed Reduction of the Retail Access Credit should be rejected. |
| NEM Files FERC Comments |
On the Working Paper on Standardized Transmission Service and Wholesale Electric Market Design. |
| NEM NY Comments on Procedural Schedule |
NEM recommends that the Procedural Schedule be amended to provide specific timelines for review and comment on the June 15 filings |
| NEM FERC Comments |
NEM says an integrated one-stop shop for commercial and reliability standards. |
| NEM FERC Comments RM02-3 |
NEM urges that the NOPR be rescinded on Derivatives Accounting and Reporting |
| NEM Files IL Brief on Exceptions |
Commonwealth Edison Company |
| NEM Files NY Reply Comments |
On Issues 2-3-4 in Unbundling Proceeding |
| NEM Files NJ Comments on BGS |
Basic Generation Service - Post Transition Procedures |
| NEM Submits NY Initial Comments |
On Issues 2-3-4 in Unbundling Proceeding |
| NEM Comments on Standard Market Design NOPR |
NEM submitted comments on the Commission's Standard Market Design rulemaking urging the Commission to insist on adherence to the principles originally set forth in the NOPR and Order 2000 that would ensure large, highly standardized RTOs/ITPs. NEM also no |
| NEM MA Comments in Competitive Market Proceeding |
Initial Comments of Competitive Suppliers Regarding Phase II and Internet-Based Customer Authorizations |
| NEM NY Comments on Customer Payment Allocations |
NEM submits that payments should be applied first to the consumables portion of the bill then non-consumables |
| NEM Files NY Comments on TSLRIC |
Total Service Long Run Incremental Costs. November 15, 2001 |
| NEM MD Comments on Retail Gas Sales Service |
NEM submits comments on the discontinuance of retail gas sales by IOUs in MD - Nov. 6, 2001 |
| NEM Files MI Comments on Mid-Sized Gas LDC Choice Programs |
NEM has a number of concerns with the proposed implementation of mid-sized LDC gas choice programs |
| NEM Files Comments on Proposed EIA Forms |
Comments on Proposed Electric Forms: EIA-411, EIA-412, EIA-423, EIA-826, EIA-860, EIA-861, and EIA-906 |
| NEM MD Comments on Retail Gas Marketing |
Comments focus specifically on initiatives necessary to promote gas choice in Maryland. |
| NEM NY Supplemental Comments on Revised Straw Proposal |
Guidelines for the Design of Standby Service Rates - modifications have the potential for Dist. Generation to become a more economic investment in NY. |
| NEM MI Comments on Mid-Sized LDC Gas Choice Programs |
NEM Files additional comments on issues framed by Staff in its August 2, 2001, Meeting Summary |
| NEM Files VA Comments |
The Commission should immediately unbundle the fully embedded monopoly costs associated with metering and related IT functions. |
| NEM NY Comments in Unbundling Proceeding |
Reply Comments express concern with Staff's proposal to group Distribution and Transmission. |
| NEM MA Comments of Competitive Market Initiatives |
Initial Comments of Competitive Suppliers Regarding Access To Customer Information |
| OH Reply Comments of Ohio Gas Marketers |
Reply comments briefly respond to the issues, positions or suggestions raised in some of the fifteen sets of Initial Comments filed in this proceeding. |
| NY - NEM Comments on Issues 1 and 5 |
Initial Comments on Issues 1 and 5 in the Unbundling Proceeding. July 30, 2001 |
| NEM Comments - EIA Form 911 |
NEM urges the proposed survey should not be imposed - July 26, 2001 |
| NEM MI Comments on Mid-Sized LDC Gas Choice Programs |
Comments on the issues raised by Staff on submissions by MGU and SEMCO for Mid-sized LDC Gas Choice Programs |
| NEM OH Comments On Proposed Gas Supplier Rules |
Comments in Response to the June 19, 2001 Entry |
| NEM New Jersey Comments |
Comments on Basic Gas Supply Service |
| NEM FERC Comments on Electronic Tariff Filings |
NEM Supports the Commission's proposal for standardization of tariff formats and the use of XML format. |
| NEM FERC Seams Presentation |
NEM Presentation to FERC - Conference on RTO Interregional Coordination June 19, 2001 |
| MA Comments of NEM and Competitive Suppliers |
Recommendations Include allowing electronic signatures for enrollment and authorize release of usage data. |
| NEM - NY Reply Comments on Standby Rate Design Principles |
NEM strongly disagrees with the Utilities' Comments and asserts that they be rejected. |
| NEM Radio Spectrum Comments to the NTIA |
National Telecommunication and Information Administration for -Consumers Must be able to respond to price signals. |
| NEM MD Comments on Competitive Metering |
The Commission should immediately unbundle costs associated with metering |
| NEM Comments on Electric EIA Reporting Requirements |
NEM Opposes new EIA Reporting Requirements to be Imposed on Electricity Marketers May 11, 2001 |
| NEM NY Comments - Unbundling Proceeding |
Case 00-M-0504 - NEM Submits comments on Unbundling Proceeding |
| NEM - NYSEG Comments on Trade Secrets |
NEM Strongly Supports Judge Stockholm's Ruling and that NYSEG's appeal should be denied. |
| NEM - FERC Comments on PJM |
NEM Opposes Proposed Changes to Reliability Assurance Agreement for the PJM System - 4-25-2001 |
| NEM - FERC Comments on NYISO |
NEM urges the Commission to Approve and Implement Demand Response System - 4-25-2001 |
| NEM PJM Motion to Intervene and Comments |
Load Response Program - NEM Strongly supports the Program |
| NEM FERC Comments - PJM Load Response Program |
Program Allows Consumers to Respond to Market Price Signals |
| NEM Comments on Form EIA- 911 A-C |
Proposed Form on Bi-Weekly Surveys to Assess Effects of Interruption of Natural Gas Supplies in the NE US |
| NEM Comments on Form EIA- 910 |
Proposed Form on Monthly Natural Gas Marketer Survey |
| NEM Comments to Federal Trade Commission |
Retail Electricity Competition Plans - V010003, March 30, 2001 |
| NEM Files Comments to FERC |
Removing Obstacles to Increased Electric Generation and Gas Supply in the Western U.S. March 29, 2001 |
| NEM Response to NYSEG's letter of March 22,2001 |
Electric Price Protection Plan
March 28, 2001 |
| NEM Statement on Proposed ConEd Settlement |
March 16, 2001 Should perform a "bottoms up" analysis. Phase 4 |
| NEM Letter NYSEG Price Protection Plan |
March 16, 2001 Reject NYSEG's proposal and institute "Bottoms Up" unbundling of NYSEG's system. |
| NEM - NY Comments in DG Proceeding |
Distributed Generation Case No. 00-E-0005 February 27, 2001 |
| NEM Submits Comments in NY |
Farm and Food Processor Electric Pilot Program |
| NEM Submits House Testimony |
The California Energy Crisis and Recommendaitons for Federal Legislation |
| NEM Submits Comments in CA |
San Diego Gas & Electric's Direct Access Program - Resolution E-3726 |
| NYSEG - NEM Files Comments |
Case 96-E-0891 NEM urges rejection of NYSEG's Compliance filing for back-out credits |
| NEM Submits Testimony to Senate Committee |
On Energy and Natural Resources, The California Energy Crisis and Recommendation for Federal Legislation |
| NEM Comments - Gas Customer Choice In Michigan |
On Small LDC Permanent Gas Customer Choice Programs - SEMCO and MGU |
| NEM Comments in NY |
on the Commission's adoption of Uniform Business Practices for the Retail Electric Market (UBP Report). |
| NEM Comments in PA |
Interim Guidelines Regarding Advance Docket No. M-00001437 Notification by an Electric Generation Supplier of Impending Changes Affecting Customer Service. |
| NEM Comments on Michigan |
Gas Choice Program, on Further Unbundling of LDC Rates and Services. |
| NEM Comments on FERC's Proposed |
California Natural Gas Marketers' Reports. |
| NEM Comments on BGE's Voluntary Electric |
Energy Monitoring and Use Pilot Program Proposal. |
| NEM Comments on on Proposed Form EIA-910 |
Monthly Natural Gas Marketer Survey |
| NEM Files Comments In New York |
Matter of Electronic Data Interchange Collaborative Filing - Case 98-M-0667 |
| NEM Files Comments in Michigan |
on Anti-Slamming and Anti-Cramming Procedures |
| NEM Comments on CA Wholesale Markets |
Comments on Market Order Proposing Remedies for Wholesale Electrics |
| NEM Files Comments in Iowa |
Small Volume Gas Transportation Proceeding |
| NEM Comments on Proposed EIA Gas Biller Survey |
Proposed Form EIA-905 would improperly impose significant and costly new reporting and record-keeping burdens never intended by Congress |
| NEM Comments in NYSEG Back Out Rates Case |
NEM has filed comments in the NYSEG Back Out Rates Case in response to NYPSC ALJ Notice. |
| Wet Signatures Add Costs to Energy Bills |
Bill Kinneary - VP & COO of Keyspan Energy - Energy Markets Article about |
| VA - NEMA Intent to File Comments |
Case No. PUE990349, June 14, 1999 Matter Concerning the participation of incumbent elec utilities in regional transmission entities. |
|
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Next Page»
|
